Paris is like marmite! You either love or hate it

View from the top of the Pantheon

When I think of Paris my mind thinks French history, i.e., the centuries of conflict that France and Britian have experienced. William the Conqueror invaded England in 1066 (the Normans were the last people to do so successfully), a date that is almost etched into every Briton’s mind.

The conflict with France continued throughout the medieval ages and late in that period there was something we still refer to as The Hundred Years’ War (It is almost inconceivable to think that it lasted 116 years!!). The very use of that appellation makes one realise that things were wrong between two great nations and had been for a long time.

The struggles continued as part of colonial and global power jostling in the 18th and 19th centuries. Long gone are those days of (pointless?) hatred where people thought it necessary to hurl things at each other and yet in its place there is a healthy rivalry.

To others’ minds the thought of Paris is of a café culture, high fashion and walking hand in hand along the Seine. Such are seduced by the city of romance; they soak up the artistic atmosphere before ascending the Eiffel Tower to be dazzled by the city of light.

I am conscious of the wide variety of thinking concerning Paris, and France in general, but it strikes me that thoughts are so polarised that Paris is like marmite! You either love or hate it. “Why?” you hear me ask. How can a major European city, an icon around the world and the capital of France be considered in such a way? Perhaps the city has such high expectations of itself that it creates its own rod for its own back in that it never seems to reach those lofty heights.   

There are some visitors who have arrived in Paris with such high expectations of the city and then are disappointed that it doesn’t meet expectations. This is often referred to as Paris syndrome and is experienced by many from the east who, anticipating much and knowing their own culture, come away quite depressed. In this post I will do my best to explore what there is to love, question what there is to hate, and hopefully conclude by letting you know in which camp I stand.

What’s to love about Paris

Paris Architecture

So far on these blogs on Paris, I have explored some of the incredible architecture the city has to offer. I have challenged its very presence and learnt much. Whilst Paris dates to Roman times, much of the city, certainly the places I visited, are only a couple of hundred years old.

Is Palais Garnier the most beautiful building in Paris? I think so. Sainte-Chapelle is so often ignored but is a timeless classic and a testament to the beauties of medieval architecture.

The tree lined boulevards are part of the transformation from medieval Paris to a modern metropolis undertaken by Haussmann’s urban renovation under Emperor Napoleon III. Maybe the most famous of avenues in the world, the iconic boulevard Champs-Élysées, is the prime example of this. Your eye will wander like the flight of a bird that passes from those trees and onto the iron balconies. Haussmann’s boulevards rival even the city’s most famous monuments. 

Parisian Monuments

Like other great cities of Europe monuments are aplenty. One must remember that they’re well spread out and this is something that can be overlooked on planning a visit. A place I haven’t posted about is the largest art museum in Paris, indeed in the world, the ‘Louvre’, or the famous Notre Dame. It would be unfair of me to write about the Louvre and do it justice after such a short visit. Sadly, the Notre Dame was being rebuilt following the tragic fire of April 2019 at the time I visited.

Beautiful monuments abound in Paris like the most monumental of triumphal arches – the ‘Arc de Triomphe’. There is the final resting place of Napoleon I at ‘Hotel des Invalides’. There are the wonderful views enjoyed from the top of Montmartre and the Sacré-Cœur Basilica.

Too many a visitor (even to travellers) Paris is a tick box exercise in that everything that it offers must be seen on their trip no matter its duration. Does rushing to each one constitute a visit? Does posing and grabbing a picture really count as visiting? Perhaps the likes gained on social media say yes but to my way of thinking this is neither travelling nor visiting.

Paris' Cuisine

Paris’ cuisine is world renowned for its rich flavours. Combinations of cheese, wine, meat and fresh produce are the foodie’s dream. Beef Bourguignon is a powerful combination of red wine and beef in a stew. Coq au vin has a sumptuous taste of chicken, wine, mushrooms and garlic. Duck confit, escargots, the list goes on. For those of a sweeter tooth macarons, gateaux and crème brûlée are staples of Parisian menus. The cafés nestled around Paris are as iconic as pubs are to London.

Among my numerous eating experiences none compares to a trip to ‘Le Train Bleu’, an iconic gourmet restaurant in the Gare de Lyon Station. Inspired by Mr Bean’s visit (from his holiday movie) I just had to go, and I wasn’t disappointed. The majestic setting, steeped in history is both distinctive and attractive. The paintings that adorn the ceilings, chandeliers and gilt work is other worldly. The artwork displays exotic destinations on the French Riviera which are accessible through the Paris-Vintimille line which dates to 1868. The food wasn’t bad either!!

Paris the epicentre of Art

Art is everywhere in the city. Paris was once home to Picasso. Paris is home to iconic museums like the Louvre, Pompidou, Musée d’Orsay and Musee de l’Orangerie. It is easy to see why it is the global epicentre of art.

Montmartre was a place not explored but was home to painters like van Gogh, Renoir and Picasso. Neither was Montparnasse yet it found fame as a 20th century artistic hub whilst the ‘The Marais’ is a bustling district filled with contemporary art galleries.

The Louvre is the largest art museum in the world, covering around 72,000 square metres and 380,000 objects. Being so huge has its challenges. I’m sure one needs a whole day (and maybe that is not enough time) to explore fully its treasures.

Be prepared for overcrowding there – it’s so bad now that even the staff are striking in protest. Prebooking is essential to avoid the queues. The crowds will gather all day at the famous ‘Mona Lisa’. This is a surreal experience as people fight to capture a picture, staff guard it along with numerous security devices in place.

I managed to visit the Louvre, but without realising the size of both the exhibition space and the crowds that gather. It would be a place worth revisiting to fully embrace its vast collections and maybe out of season if there is such a thing.

Neither were visits made to Musée de l’Orangerie where Monet’s Water Lilies can be seen or the Pompidou where works by Picasso and Kandinsky can be found. Musée d’Orsay is perhaps the one that I regret not visiting the most. The former railway station alone is enticing which now houses French art dating 1848 to 1914.

Romance

Known all over the world as the ‘City of Love’ the architecture, art and culture combine to create this fabled romantic atmosphere. When visiting the Eiffel tower, you will be amazed at the surrounding area where wedding photo shoots take place. There are options for proposals, chuck in fake flowers, heart ballons and you can see why some might see it as red mist descending on the iconic site. But to those of you who clearly view this as the place to propose then my congratulations. To me it doesn’t seem very intimate or private.

Some of the Paris’ beautiful backdrops and sensational settings scream romantic gestures yet finding other less touristy places around the city may be as romantic yet more private. Walking hand in hand along the Siene certainly feels aligned to romance – whether it is safe or not is another question.

Paris’ ‘City of Love’ originates from the 19th century as privileged American men would flock to the city in pursuit of entertainment. Music and dancing halls, paintings, sculptures and even the opera were experiences not to be missed. Countless novels, songs and movies have portrayed the city of love.

What’s not to love

Paris unfortunate reputation for cleanliness and smell

Social media feeds and travel chat carp about the cleanliness and smell. I can’t recall things being as bad as people make out, but I may be wrong. Paris’ problems stem from two things – it is an overpopulated and over visited city. There are over 2 million people calling the city home and a further 30 million people visiting each year. The city was built 200 years ago and is going to have many modern-day problems. Coupled with that the many people walking the streets makes litter a major problem.

Furthermore, as a responsible dog owner, it would be amiss of me not to mention dog poop. This is a notoriously big problem in the city as locals don’t pick up after their dogs. Why don’t Parisians legislate against this behaviour? Perhaps we should ask if dogs should be living in a city? What quality of life do they enjoy? That discussion aside, watch your step as you take in the sights.

I wish I could say that Paris’ streets smell of freshly baked baguettes. Sadly, that is far from the truth. The streets are often described as urine soaked. It must be stated that this is not true of every street but there are too many of them that are blighted by this problem. Humans have a lot for which to answer including our animal like behaviour.

With the Olympics in Paris (2024), much money has been invested in improving the water quality of the river Seine. Over a century ago, swimming in the Seine was part of everyday Parisian life. Having looked at the river, it hardly looks appealing. I will have to return to see if there was return on this investment. It is good to dream – how iconic it would be to swim in the Seine.

A community has been set up by local Parisians united around the #SaccageParis which highlighted its mismanagement. A look into the # will show a photo trail of evidence that locals have provided about its state.

Paris certainly draws crowds which brings a host of scams

As mentioned, a whopping 30 million people visit the city each year (considerably higher than the number of tourists visiting London and quite an unthinkable number). Visit at the wrong time and your experience will be painful. I have touched on how crowds flock to the main monuments that lose their appeal as there is a need to fight through the crowds to explore. Finding those lesser-known places remains a challenge, even more so as social media proclaims these finds and sets another trend.

Have you been to Paris if you’ve not climbed the Eiffel Tower or stepped inside the Louvre or been up the hill to Sacre Coeur? Findling the balance in achieving these objectives and avoiding the crowds remains a traveller’s goal.

Big crowds fuel a 21st century problem – scams. Be careful of the crowds swarming around those monuments. Pick pocketers feast on the weak, vulnerable and distracted. Once you have broken free from the web of confusion, be careful not to be preyed upon by men forcing bracelets onto your arm. This normally leads to a standoff over payment for something forced upon you. Finally, don’t trip over the “temporary shops” that proliferate the pavements. Unravelled from bed sheets and backpacks are Chinese knock offs. Save your money for those proper shops.

There are, I’m sure, quieter places around the country that would give a more authentic vision of France. Sadly, it feels that Paris has lost its soul.

Are Parisian's rude & unfriendly

“Paris would be great if it wasn’t for all the Parisians.” I have read and heard this sentiment in many a chat about Paris. I understand why some locals come across as rude. How many English speaking people waltz into a shop or restaurant speaking in English and expect to hear the same language spoken back? The entitlement of tourists is beyond rude – it is insulting.

Now, I’m not fluent in French. I have a few French phrases from my school days that can at least get me through some pleasantries. I tried to speak in the native tongue and by the time I had gone through my repertoire the waiters were generally keen to engage. I haven’t experienced any rudeness – perhaps the tourist should try harder.

What happened to visiting a country and embracing the culture, the people and the language? This is a post for another day. Has travel lost its meaning? When children ask why they are learning French in school it should be easy to answer – so that when you visit France you can strike up a conversation.

My caveat to all this is that if you’re not being spoken to in French on arrival at a café, bar or restaurant, are you really visiting a local establishment? The premises themselves are clearly local, but could it be that people from other parts of the world are seizing the employment opportunity and forcing the locals away?

Paris' Traffic & Noise

Another negative of the city is the amount of traffic and noise. Those long tree lined avenues, once the envy of the world, seem to have lost their identities as cars swarm the roads and people cram the pathways. In Paris’ defence it is not the only city to suffer such problems. I’m sure tales could be shared from any other major city like London, Rome, Madrid, New York, etc.

Perhaps a special mention should be made of the most famous roundabout. This looks like a nightmare to drive around when there seems to be no rules. It looks like cars hurtling around in a circle then veering off when they finally see their avenue. Thankfully pedestrians have been saved from all this with an underground passageway to the monumental arch. Some people, however, ignore the safety of the subway in pursuit of a perfect picture.

Expensive

Paris isn’t cheap!! Maybe I did it wrong, or I’m forgetting how much these incredible places are to visit. It just seemed way more expensive than any of the other major cities visited around the world. My experiences in Sydney would run it close. Whether you aim to do it on a budget or try and live the high life then your wallet is going to take a hammering. The number of monuments that must be visited soon add up, and then throw in accommodation, eating, drinking, etc.

Sitting here and adding up all the places visited comes in a little cheaper than the Paris pass which could be used to save money. I’m sure there are experts out there who will provide you with the information needed to save some money or offer free places to enjoy the city.

Paris conclusions

One either loves Paris or one hates it. Hate is a strong word, but there is a consensus that Paris does not live up to the expectations. Therein lies the city’s biggest problem for it is portrayed as such a wonderful place, where love is in the air, architecture hugs you and light dazzles you. It promises much yet can leave you broke, disappointed and, in some cases, sick. I try to keep politics out of these posts but would comment that Paris is not the only city to suffer homelessness, drugs, dirt, smell, etc. The evidence for these problems is there for all to see when visiting.

High expectations normally lead to disappointment. If the bar wasn’t set so high would Paris endear itself to people. This trip though has opened my eyes to French history, another fascinating subject to learn about. 

Sadly though I didn’t fall in love with Paris. In this post I have provided a summary of some of the things that Paris has to offer which I love. I mean, who can’t help but love the inside of the Palais Garnier and Sainte-Chapelle? Or explore the final resting place of Napoleon? Or be overwhelmed by the epicentre of art? I really didn’t do the ‘art’ scene justice as I only made a quick visit. The Eiffel Tower remains a mystery to me. What is all the fuss about? It appears odd and out of place – a blemish on an otherwise beautiful cityscape. I have also highlighted the issues that I and others share on the city. Leave a comment below as I would be interested to hear yours!

Paris, though, has taught me much and inspired me to visit other places and not only in France but in England as well. A couple of these places are close to Paris – the palace at Versailles and the Basilique de Saint-Denis. One much closer to home that I hope to visit sooner rather than later is St Michael’s Abbey, Farnborough.

Arc de Triomphe the most monumental of all triumphal arches?

Arc de Triomphe

Another famous monument in Paris is the Arc de Triomphe – the most sacred symbol of France – but is it the most monumental of all triumphal arches? I will try to leave my bias for Rome aside for a while. It’s a hard call to make when I haven’t visited all the world’s famous arches. I didn’t realise that there are 4 in Paris alone.

I have walked through the Wellington Arch in London many times but never been up top. The same is true for Admiralty Arch, also in London. I have never seen Brandenburg Gate in Berlin. I have, however, been to Rome and seen the Arches of Constantine, Titus and Septimius Severus. There could be a further debate as to whether the Arc de Triomphe is Paris’ most recognisable monument ahead of the Eiffel Tower, the Louvre, Sacré-Cœur, etc.

Its origins belong predominantly to the man whose tomb I visited at Hôtel des Invalides – Napoleon Bonaparte I. Napoleon I changed so much of mainland Europe early in the 19th century through his military campaigns and upheaval of government and laws.

In looking at the evidence of Napoleon I around Paris there seems to be a connection with Rome, an influence by Rome, and almost admiration of Rome. Surely inspiration for the Arc de Triomphe was taken from the Arch of Titus and the other two remaining arches in Rome. The Arch of Titus was designed to glorify the memory of individual emperors and their deeds. Septimius Severus Arch was built to celebrate defeat of the Parthians. The Arch of Constantine was built to commemorate Constantine’s victory over Maxentius.

Napoleon I was head of the greatest army in Europe since Roman times. He was to fight around 80 military campaigns. Shortly after his most famous victory at Austerlitz, Napoleon I commissioned the construction of two arches. The more famous of the two, we call it the Arc de Triomphe, was built to glorify the grand army. The second, the Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel, was dedicated to his victories in the wars of the third and fourth coalitions.

The Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel is not to be confused with the more famous Arc de Triomphe. It is a separate triumphal arch. It is located at the western end of the Louvre and at the eastern end of the Paris historical axis. This is a 9km long, linear route that is sometime called the Triumphal way and runs from the Louvre to the new business district.

The Arc Du Carrousel was built in just two years. The arch is half the size of Arc de Triomphe. One part of its design has eight Corinthian marble columns. On top of the Arc is ‘Peace’ riding in a triumphal chariot. The Arc is plagiaristic of the Arch of Septimius Severus in Rome.

Construction of the towering Arc de Triomphe was a rollercoaster of a journey. A journey that would take around 30 years. This was due to breaks in building due to rise and fall of Napoleon I and the consequent instability that followed the revolution and 1st Empire.

Jean-François Thérèse Chalgrin and Jean-Arnaud Raymond were the chosen original architects. Their plan was inspired by the Arch of Titus with a simple opening as it was to also act as a gateway to the city.

On the 2nd of April 1810 Napoleon I married Marie-Louise of Austria. Part of the planned celebrations was to arrive in Paris through the Arc de Triomphe. But at that time only the footings were complete, so an ephemeral arch was created. This proved to be a very expensive operation, but the real size model allowed Chalgrin to make amendments to his designs.

Chalgrin like Napoleon I would never see the Arc completed. He died on 20th January 1811. After the fall of Napoleon I, building was suspended by King Louis XVIII. The revolution had overthrown the monarchy yet here we were with another monarch of France. Confusing I know, and hard to keep up.

In 1823 Louis XVIII announced that the Arc be completed with a new dedication. Dedicated to his nephew Louis Antoine de Bourbon, Duke of Angouleme. The duke had managed to reinstate the King of Spain (Ferdinand VII) to his throne. France claimed this as their victory with the new dedication of the Arc to ‘Army of the Pyrenees’. When construction resumed, Louis-Robert Goust was associated with another architect, Jean-Nicolas Huyot. They proposed columns be added to the arch a bit like the arch of Septimus Severus in Rome.

 After Louis XVIII died his brother (Charles X) came to the throne and continued with his wishes to construct the monument. Huyot was dismissed temporarily for his desire to add the columns to the arch. Charles decided that the original plans of Chalgrin should be respected and completed.

After years of national turmoil, the Arc was completed on 29th July 1836. It had been 30 years in the making and it was dedicated in front of a small gathering of dignitaries.

On the 4 pedestals of the Arc de Triomphe are masterpieces of sculpture that depict specific historic events. The most renowned of the sculptures is ‘The departure of the volunteers’ of 1792 (by François Rude) commonly known as ‘La Marsellaise’. The other three include Napoleon I’s Triumph of 1810 (by Jean-Pierre Cortot) which includes him being crowned by the goddess of Victory. The others are the Résistance of 1814 (by Antoine Etex) & Peace of 1815 (Antoine Etex).

Engraved on the Arc de Triomphe are the names of the locations of famous victories and 660 military leaders. On the facades of the arch are six reliefs representing the moments of the French Revolution and Napoleonic era. The ‘Battle of Aboukir’, The ‘funeral of General Marceau’, The ‘Battle of Jemappes’, The ‘Capture of Alexandria’, The ‘crossing of the Arcole Bridge’ & The ‘Battle of Austerlitz’.

In 1921 the tomb of the unknown soldier was incorporated into the monument beneath the arch. Each day at 18:30 the tomb’s flame is rekindled as a symbol and respect to those who have fallen in the name of France.

Visiting the Arc is a must on a visit to Paris and one that I thoroughly enjoyed. Though surrounded by fast-moving cars, it seemed quieter there than at the Eiffel Tower. Thankfully safe access is provided to the Arc via a tunnel under the roundabout.

Pre-purchased tickets are essential these days and this meant queues were avoided. Tickets can be purchased from here, currently €22 for an adult. Access to the top is up a winding staircase via a museum on the top floor.

The views at the top are spectacular! Sprawling from the epicentre of Paris is a Parisian panorama. A majestic sight, a blanket of rooftops with iconic monuments standing out from afar. The tree lined avenues add some colour to a rooftop wilderness. Each avenue leads off from each number of the clock face.

The iconic and bustling Champs-Elysée stretches out to the Louvre. The Eiffel Tower stands like a pinnacle, piercing the skyline. It’s perhaps best viewed from afar. The golden dome of the l’hôtel des Invalides glistens in the bright sunshine. In one direction Sacré-Cœur stands atop Monmarte watching out over the city. In the opposite direction is a collection of modern skyscrapers. It is noticeable that these modern monstrosities have been kept to the outskirts of the city.

The Arc de Triomphe is famously located at the western end of the Champs-Élysées. It stands proudly in the middle of Place Charles de Gaulle. 12 avenues converge on the Place Charle de Gaulle.

When looking from above, many people refer to it as Arc de Triomphe de L’Etoile (star shape) as the 12 avenues radiate their way away from the roundabout. I take the view of a watch piece, each avenue a number on the face. The towering arch surely makes the site the most famous roundabout in the world.

To aid the debate over the most monumental of all triumphal arches lets view some figures and compare with others. The Arc de Triomphe stands at a height of 50 metres, it is 45 metres wide and 22 metres deep.

In Paris the Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel stands at 19 metres high, 23 metres wide and 7.3m deep.

Wellington Arch in London stands at 18.3m high and 18.3m wide.

Brandenburg gate is 26 metres high, 65.5 metres wide and 11 metres deep.

Our Roman entries include:

The Arch of Titus is only 15.4m metres high, 13.5 metres wide and 4.75 metres deep.

The Septimius Severus Arch is 23m high and 25 metre wide.

The Arch of Constatine is 21 metres high, 25.0 metres wide and 7.4 metres deep.

I hope that I have proved the Arc de Triomphe is the most prominent if not the most monumental of triumphal arches. Its troublesome construction ended with a legacy to the nation. It is an icon not only of Paris but of France itself. Whilst the structure is clearly monumental, I certainly feel it is a copycat of previous incarnations.

The arch’s relatively young age goes to prove how incredible the Romans were at building. I find the appeal of the Roman arches, that have stood the test of time, more appealing. I can’t find an argument for this being the most monumental of all triumphal arches.

Writing about this has stirred memories of Rome and questioned why I still haven’t written about that great city. It has also inspired me to properly visit the Wellington Arch in London. Hopefully I can time this visit correctly with the troops passing under the arch. Inspiration is also there to visit two international sites, a visit to Berlin and see the Brandenberg gate and Austerlitz (Slavkov u Brna town in Cech Republic).

I will leave you with the words of Napoleon I, “You will not return to your homes but through arches of triumph”. As a traveller and visitor to the great city of Paris perhaps the last place on your itinerary should be the Arc de Triomphe. Not as a returning hero of war but leaving a triumphant tourist. 

Is Palais Garnier Paris’s most beautiful building?

Palais Garnier

The next stop on my meander around Paris was a visit to The Palais Garnier Opera House. Why, you might ask, when there are more illustrious places to visit? What about the Louvre? Arc de Triomphe? Musée d’Orsay? to name but a few. My visit to the Eiffel tower led me to discover Charles Garnier. Not a household name, but it was of particular interest that he was the architect of the Palais Garnier and one of the harshest Eiffel Tower critics. I went to see if there was any justification in his words.

Building Palais Garnier

The Opera House was commissioned by Napolean III during his reign as Emperor in the second French Republic. Napolean III was the nephew of the first Emperor Napoleon I. He brought much wealth and prosperity to France through his authoritarian government. Much of the beauty of Paris that people love today is down to this member of the Bonaparte family and his prefect Baron Haussmann. These two saw the Opera House as the Jewel in their urban renewal of Paris.

A competition was opened for entries at the end of 1860 to build the largest theatre in the world. Out of 171 entries it was the design of unknown architect Charles Garnier that won the competition. 15 years were devoted to building the Opera House, which was briefly halted by the Prussian war. The war would bring an end of the Napolean III rule over France. He was exiled to Britain where he died in Chislehurst, Kent in 1873 (buried in St Michael’s Abbey, Farnborough some 15 years later), 2 years before the completion of his opera house.

And what a result. Beautiful. There is no comparison that can be made between the ugliness of the metal monstrosity to the magnificence of the Palais. There surely can only be one winner and his views are, in my opinion, justified.

Palais Garnier

Externally the building commands your immediate attention; internally it will take your breath away. Charles was clearly a well-travelled man, and he took inspiration from other eras of architecture. I’m sure there will be many more examples around the rest of Paris. The Opera house includes elements of the Renaissance, Baroque and Palladio architectural styles. The results are spell binding and fit for a king….. sorry, I mean Emperor. There are rumours that Empress Eugenie asked what style it was to which Charles replied, “Napolean III style”.

Avenue de l’Opéra

Walking down the Avenue de l’Opéra you will approach Palais Garnier. You will witness the façade on the south side of the building. The levels of detail are incredible – arches and columns perfectly and symmetrically aligned. Much can be learned from studying the façade. Of particular interest to me are gilded bronze busts of the great opera composers, Rossini, Auber, Beethoven, Mozart, Spontini, Meyerbeer & Halevy. Above them are the letters “N” and “E” for Napolean Emperor. At the top of the façade are two beautiful golden pieces – Harmony and Poetry.

Pavilion de l’Empereur

Head around to the western side of the building to the Pavilion de l’Empereur. Access is made into the opera house here. The design, though, was to provide the emperor and others with a secure and safe entry into the Opera house from their carriages. One of the main reasons for building the opera house was an attempted assassination by Italian Felice Orsini 1858 which took place on Napoleon III’s route to the old opera house. At the ticketed entrance is a statue to Charles Garnier.

Palais Garnier Grand Staircase

Stepping inside the Palais is a mesmerizing experience. The sumptuous and lavish decorations are something to behold. There is a sense of royalty, as marble, velvet, gold leaf, figures, cherubs, chandeliers, frescoes are used to opulently decorate the interior. The brilliance of Baroque architecture is on full display. There is a debate to be had I’m sure in a future post between this opera house and the rooms seen in Palazzo Vecchio and Pitti Palace in Florence, and maybe the Hall of Mirrors in Versailles.

To get to the incredible grand foyer first you pass through the sweeping steps of the grand staircase. Many a photo I’m sure has been taken on those steps. Breathtaking beauty surrounds you and good luck trying to capture that beauty without a person in the shot. Charles Garnier said it best when he proclaimed, “The Opera is the staircase”. Once you have dragged yourself away from the incredible marble staircase work your way in and out of the alcoves and network of corridors.

Grand Foyer

This is a room to rival many of the greats across Europe. Comparisons are supposedly made with the hall of mirrors at Versailles (I explored this later in this trip). I would say that comparisons could be made of the Palatine Gallery in Palazzo Pitti. Similarities between the Hall of Mirrors and the Grand Foyer are down to the use of windows and mirrors. The light pouring in adds to the architectural brilliance. The Grand Foyer was built as a meeting room for spectators during intermissions, and what a place to meet.

Impressive chandeliers gracefully compliment the beautiful foyer. Practical as well as decorative they hang from an incredible ceiling. The fresco ceiling by Paul Baudry pays homage to the history of music. The central fresco “The Triumph of Apollo” celebrates the god of music and poetry. Gilded decorations and gold adorn the walls, ceiling and columns. Neck ache is compulsory as this room is an architectural masterpiece and embodies the grandeur of the Second Republic.  

Palais Garnier Summary

My opinions of the Eiffel Tower may have been controversial, but I would like to think we can all share common ground on the beauty and magnificence of the Palais Garnier. I’m not sure I will find a more beautiful building in the whole of Paris. The pictures will never do it justice; sometimes it is best to just stand and appreciate. For that reason, I would implore everyone to visit. Its lavish and opulent display seems a world away from reality.

Palais Garner is testament to the monumental achievement in architecture and design. Every detail has been thought about and account made. The grand foyer is the most impressive part of the complex. It is safe to say that I have more of an appreciation of this form of architecture than more modern structures which may be practical but lack character.

In my visit I perhaps didn’t capture the beauty of the place as well as I would have liked. This iconic venue demands a second visit. Dare to dream but a return to watch a live performance of an opera would be magical. Sadly, though, I think that I will only be able to watch a ballet here these days as the opera has moved into a newer build.

Having briefly touched on the Bonaparte family my next stop around Paris will be Hôtel des Invalides. A visit to St Michael’s Abbey, Farnborough (the photos on the internet makes it look great) is now a must!