When I hear the word Pantheon, I think of Rome not Paris

Pantheon - Paris

Nestled in the Italian quarter of Paris is the Parisian Pantheon. When one hears the word Pantheon, one’s mind thinks Rome. Yet here I am standing in Paris, slightly bewildered at the sight, making the inevitable comparisons, yet feeling a sense of betrayal that the glory of Rome has been duped. My naivety and confusion continue as the dome on top looks like that of the Vatican or St Paul’s Cathedral in London. As I approach, I take a moment to ask myself, am I really in Paris or Rome (or maybe London)?

This Roman inspired monument was an ambitious project to rival these two religious buildings. The towering Corinthian columns guarding the entrance, seem like a spitting image of the Roman equivalent. A noticeable difference between the two, though, is the impressive dome that crowns the roof. It is well worth paying (16E 2025 summer price) to go up and to get wonderful 360º views of the city.

Originally it was built as a church under the commission of King Louis XV to honor Saint Geneviève and house her relics. The former abbey church gives a glimpse into France’s tumultuous history. It is not a pantheon to the gods but is now a secular temple. Its crypt is home to the remains of some of France’s greatest people. Inside the Pantheon itself, the ‘crossing’ of the church is the site of a scientific display (more later). Join me as I explore yet another Parisian monument.

Pantheon origins

In 1744 King Louis XV was on the throne of France. He was involved in the War of the Austrian Succession when he fell seriously ill in Metz, France. This was one battle that King Louis XV was able to call a success. His battles rarely resulted in victories, and they were a drain on the nation’s coffers (important to know for later). During his illness King Louis XV sought help from Saint Geneviève, the patron saint of Paris.

His recovery from serious illness meant he went on a pilgrimage to the abbey on top of Sainte-Geneviève Mountain where the Saine-Geneviève relics were kept. Sainte-Geneviève Mountain is hardly such, but a small hill overlooking the Seine which would have been on the outskirts of Paris. King Louis XV made a promise to the monks there that he would reconstruct their ancient church and dedicate it to the patron saint of Paris and France.

Embarrassingly, King Louis XV made such a promise with no money in the bank. Rather than borrow he organised a huge royal lottery to raise the money. The money was eventually raised after 20 years. The first stone was laid by the king on the 6th September 1764.

Pantheon Design & Architecture

The chosen architect for this monarchist project was Jacques-Germain Soufflot (1713-1780). Relatively young and an unknown he chose a Greek cross plan for the layout with a triple dome to sit on the top. His first design was submitted in 1755. Like the king he would never see the finished church. It’s remarkable to consider the length of time that was taken to build these structures. The project was completed in 1790, i.e., it took an incredible 26 years to finish.

The similarities to the Pantheon in Rome are for all to see on the main façade. Classical Corinthian columns sit underneath the triangular pediment above. In the Roman Pantheon the words relate to the builder Marcus Agrippa: in the Parisian Pantheon the words read “to great men, the grateful homeland”.

Stepping inside be prepared to be wowed as the art and architecture combine for a beautiful display. Domes, vaults, ceilings and have been perfectly aligned to allow the light to pour in. The inside is more vibrant than the solemn appearance of the older Rome edition. The best part of 1800 years separate the construction of the two buildings. The Greek cross design means there are 4 naves of equal size emanating from the central crossing.

Above the central crossing is the 3 layered dome. Comparisons here should shift from the Roman Pantheon and pass to another building in the Italian capital along with Sir Christopher Wren’s masterpiece in London. There are similarities between St Peter’s Basilica and St Paul’s Cathedral and these may be compared with the Parisian Pantheon.

Roman columns surround the bottom of the dome which then sits on top. They provide one of the most magical views across Parisian skyline. The Soufflot design allowed for each dome to fit one inside the other. Maybe Soufflot had been to Florence and seen how the dome on the Cathedral Santa Maria del Fiore was constructed.

Church or Temple

The building was completed shortly after the French revolution began and it was going to share the ups and downs of the nation. Its use changed an incredible 6 times from a church to a temple.

Marquis de Vilette proposed that the church be made a temple devoted to liberty, on the model of the Pantheon in Rome. The Roman Pantheon remains a Roman Catholic church whereas Paris’s version is now purely a secular temple. Napoleon I returned the building to the Catholic Church in 1806.

The crypt has remained a mausoleum for many French dignitaries since that time – a who’s who of modern French influence. The bodies of people with illustrious names including writers Voltaire, Rousseau, Victor Hugo (hunchback of Notre-Dame and Les Misérables), Émile Zola and Alexandre Dumas and their memorials are to be found there. The remains of scientists Louis Braille (creator of a tactile writing system of raised dots), Marie & Pierre Curie are also there. Monuments to national heroes and politicians like Jean Moulin, Simone Veil and Jean Jaures may be discovered there. In total there are 81 people buried in the Pantheon – 75 men and 6 women.

Foucault Pendulum

“You are invited to come and see the Earth turn”. These are the words written on invitations from 1851 inviting people to come to see an experiment at the Parisian Pantheon. The dome, whilst very aesthetically very pleasing, also became practical. Napoleon III, who was fond of science and history, allowed the physicist Léon Foucault and the engineer Gustave Froment to use the dome to demonstrate their experiment about the earth turning. I must confess that I somewhat ignored the importance of this when I visited.

Alas when you hear Pantheon, you think of Rome not Paris

You are not wrong when you think, ‘Is there a Pantheon in Paris?’ Well, there certainly is and one cannot argue as to its beauty and its history. It tends to be omitted from most Parisian itineraries which makes for a pleasant and enjoyable visit. This maybe because the Roman Pantheon is more illustrious, more historic and has stood the test of time. It’s lack of profile may just be down to ignorance of its existence.

Ignore this place at your peril – its superb design and subsequent construction was inspired not only by the Roman version but by another iconic Roman building – St Peter’s Basilica. The Neo-classical architecture is imposing yet pleasing as Paris sought to compete with the two other great religious buildings of the time and, in my opinion, they did a good job. Having visited all four mentioned in this post yet only written about one, I must find some time and dedicate posts to each.

So, I leave this fascinating building, a hidden gem and a must see visit when in the city. I’m saying to myself, “When you hear the word Pantheon, think both Rome and Paris.”

Is Palais Garnier Paris’s most beautiful building?

Palais Garnier

The next stop on my meander around Paris was a visit to The Palais Garnier Opera House. Why, you might ask, when there are more illustrious places to visit? What about the Louvre? Arc de Triomphe? Musée d’Orsay? to name but a few. My visit to the Eiffel tower led me to discover Charles Garnier. Not a household name, but it was of particular interest that he was the architect of the Palais Garnier and one of the harshest Eiffel Tower critics. I went to see if there was any justification in his words.

Building Palais Garnier

The Opera House was commissioned by Napolean III during his reign as Emperor in the second French Republic. Napolean III was the nephew of the first Emperor Napoleon I. He brought much wealth and prosperity to France through his authoritarian government. Much of the beauty of Paris that people love today is down to this member of the Bonaparte family and his prefect Baron Haussmann. These two saw the Opera House as the Jewel in their urban renewal of Paris.

A competition was opened for entries at the end of 1860 to build the largest theatre in the world. Out of 171 entries it was the design of unknown architect Charles Garnier that won the competition. 15 years were devoted to building the Opera House, which was briefly halted by the Prussian war. The war would bring an end of the Napolean III rule over France. He was exiled to Britain where he died in Chislehurst, Kent in 1873 (buried in St Michael’s Abbey, Farnborough some 15 years later), 2 years before the completion of his opera house.

And what a result. Beautiful. There is no comparison that can be made between the ugliness of the metal monstrosity to the magnificence of the Palais. There surely can only be one winner and his views are, in my opinion, justified.

Palais Garnier

Externally the building commands your immediate attention; internally it will take your breath away. Charles was clearly a well-travelled man, and he took inspiration from other eras of architecture. I’m sure there will be many more examples around the rest of Paris. The Opera house includes elements of the Renaissance, Baroque and Palladio architectural styles. The results are spell binding and fit for a king….. sorry, I mean Emperor. There are rumours that Empress Eugenie asked what style it was to which Charles replied, “Napolean III style”.

Avenue de l’Opéra

Walking down the Avenue de l’Opéra you will approach Palais Garnier. You will witness the façade on the south side of the building. The levels of detail are incredible – arches and columns perfectly and symmetrically aligned. Much can be learned from studying the façade. Of particular interest to me are gilded bronze busts of the great opera composers, Rossini, Auber, Beethoven, Mozart, Spontini, Meyerbeer & Halevy. Above them are the letters “N” and “E” for Napolean Emperor. At the top of the façade are two beautiful golden pieces – Harmony and Poetry.

Pavilion de l’Empereur

Head around to the western side of the building to the Pavilion de l’Empereur. Access is made into the opera house here. The design, though, was to provide the emperor and others with a secure and safe entry into the Opera house from their carriages. One of the main reasons for building the opera house was an attempted assassination by Italian Felice Orsini 1858 which took place on Napoleon III’s route to the old opera house. At the ticketed entrance is a statue to Charles Garnier.

Palais Garnier Grand Staircase

Stepping inside the Palais is a mesmerizing experience. The sumptuous and lavish decorations are something to behold. There is a sense of royalty, as marble, velvet, gold leaf, figures, cherubs, chandeliers, frescoes are used to opulently decorate the interior. The brilliance of Baroque architecture is on full display. There is a debate to be had I’m sure in a future post between this opera house and the rooms seen in Palazzo Vecchio and Pitti Palace in Florence, and maybe the Hall of Mirrors in Versailles.

To get to the incredible grand foyer first you pass through the sweeping steps of the grand staircase. Many a photo I’m sure has been taken on those steps. Breathtaking beauty surrounds you and good luck trying to capture that beauty without a person in the shot. Charles Garnier said it best when he proclaimed, “The Opera is the staircase”. Once you have dragged yourself away from the incredible marble staircase work your way in and out of the alcoves and network of corridors.

Grand Foyer

This is a room to rival many of the greats across Europe. Comparisons are supposedly made with the hall of mirrors at Versailles (I explored this later in this trip). I would say that comparisons could be made of the Palatine Gallery in Palazzo Pitti. Similarities between the Hall of Mirrors and the Grand Foyer are down to the use of windows and mirrors. The light pouring in adds to the architectural brilliance. The Grand Foyer was built as a meeting room for spectators during intermissions, and what a place to meet.

Impressive chandeliers gracefully compliment the beautiful foyer. Practical as well as decorative they hang from an incredible ceiling. The fresco ceiling by Paul Baudry pays homage to the history of music. The central fresco “The Triumph of Apollo” celebrates the god of music and poetry. Gilded decorations and gold adorn the walls, ceiling and columns. Neck ache is compulsory as this room is an architectural masterpiece and embodies the grandeur of the Second Republic.  

Palais Garnier Summary

My opinions of the Eiffel Tower may have been controversial, but I would like to think we can all share common ground on the beauty and magnificence of the Palais Garnier. I’m not sure I will find a more beautiful building in the whole of Paris. The pictures will never do it justice; sometimes it is best to just stand and appreciate. For that reason, I would implore everyone to visit. Its lavish and opulent display seems a world away from reality.

Palais Garner is testament to the monumental achievement in architecture and design. Every detail has been thought about and account made. The grand foyer is the most impressive part of the complex. It is safe to say that I have more of an appreciation of this form of architecture than more modern structures which may be practical but lack character.

In my visit I perhaps didn’t capture the beauty of the place as well as I would have liked. This iconic venue demands a second visit. Dare to dream but a return to watch a live performance of an opera would be magical. Sadly, though, I think that I will only be able to watch a ballet here these days as the opera has moved into a newer build.

Having briefly touched on the Bonaparte family my next stop around Paris will be Hôtel des Invalides. A visit to St Michael’s Abbey, Farnborough (the photos on the internet makes it look great) is now a must!